Circularity begins before detailed design

A product cannot become circular through recycling instructions added shortly before launch. Circularity is largely determined by early decisions: product architecture, material combinations, joining methods, access to wear parts, software support and the intended business model. When these decisions are fixed, later improvements are often expensive or limited.

The design team should therefore define the desired circular strategy at concept level. Is the product intended to last longer, be repaired, upgraded, reused, remanufactured or recycled at high quality? Different strategies require different technical and commercial choices.

Understand the product lifecycle and failure modes

The team needs a realistic picture of how the product is produced, used, maintained and returned. Which components determine lifetime? Which parts fail or become obsolete? Who has access to the product after use? Is reverse logistics available? A technically recyclable product has little practical value when it is never collected or when the recovered material has no viable market.

Service data, warranty cases, customer interviews and teardown of returned products can reveal where value is lost. This evidence supports decisions on modularity, spare parts and refurbishment processes.

Design principles for circular products

Several principles are broadly useful. Components with different lifetimes should be separable. Wear parts should be accessible without destroying valuable modules. Joining methods should support the intended disassembly process. Material diversity and incompatible combinations should be reduced where this does not compromise function. Identification of materials and components improves sorting and reuse.

Modularity should be applied selectively. Additional interfaces can increase cost, weight and failure risk. The right question is not whether a product is modular, but where modularity creates lifecycle value. A function-cost and lifecycle-value analysis can help identify the optimal boundaries.

Evaluate the business case

Circularity requires economic logic. Longer life may reduce replacement sales but strengthen customer loyalty or enable service revenue. Remanufacturing requires return rates, inspection standards and a cost-effective recovery process. Recycled material may reduce environmental impact but introduce quality variation or supply constraints.

Cost models should include the complete lifecycle: production, service, return logistics, inspection, recovery yield, replacement parts and residual value. Scenario analysis is useful because return rates and market prices are uncertain. This prevents circular concepts from being selected based only on technical enthusiasm.

Turn circularity into measurable requirements

Targets might include minimum service life, maximum repair time, percentage of recoverable value, number of disassembly steps, availability of spare parts or share of reusable modules. These criteria should be included in concept evaluation and verified through prototypes or pilot returns.

Circular product development is not a single method. It combines ecodesign, value engineering, material expertise, cost analysis and business-model thinking. When these disciplines work together, circularity can reduce resource use while creating products that are easier to maintain, more resilient and more valuable over time.

RENNET perspective

RENNET combines industrial expertise, Cost and Value Engineering methods, manufacturing knowledge and digital tools to support fact-based product decisions.

Ready to optimize your products?

Talk to RENNET’s experts about Cost Engineering, Value Engineering, Supply Chain Optimization and Product Development.

Book a Strategy Call

Weitere interessante Artikel

Entdecke weitere Beiträge im RENNET Knowledge Hub.